Asus C90S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 66% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus C90S (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK C90S
Memory	1.4 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080219
Uptime	16.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '17 at 12:58
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	38%
CPU Throttled	66%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6600-$90 8,894 User benchmarks, average bench 37% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Memory 36.9 1-Core 18.1 2-Core 20.6 19% 25.2 Pts	4-Core 28.4 8-Core 21.9 4% 25.1 Pts	64-Core 23.9 2% 23.9 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 837GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 93 92 2368 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 693 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 582 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 10 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 692 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 21 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 14 (C2) HDA temperature 64 43 244813660192 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 2882 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 10 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 22489	42.9% Average	Read 78.9 Write 71.1 Mixed 69.1 55% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.36 4K Mixed 0.24 38% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate USB 3.0 64GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 20GB free, PID 1656 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 15.2 Mixed 18.3 25% 22 MB/s	4K Read 4.07 4K Write 0.86 4K Mixed 0.28 54% 1.74 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	6.05% Terrible	MC Read 1.2 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 1.2 5% 1.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 1.9 6% 2.23 GB/s	Latency 217 18% 217 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.05% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus C90S

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)