Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus Z97-PRO GAMER (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160226
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Dec 25 '22 at 04:01
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 76.8 1-Core 89.9 2-Core 171 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 244 33% 247 Pts	64-Core 275 17% 275 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 0588) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	48.4% Average	Lighting 61 Reflection 58.9 Parallax 82.5 50% 67.5 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 67.5 Splatting 44.6 46% 57.4 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 206 207 207 205 204 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 430 Write 371 Mixed 374 SusWrite 214 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 35.6 124% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 351 263% 351 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 129%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB 7,087 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 663GB free Firmware: 04.01G01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 83 84 84 82 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 92.3 Write 81.9 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 83.1 61% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-006.A01LF 4x4GB 191 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,398x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	542x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	293x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	454x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	220x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	181x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	187x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	74x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	126x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	108x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	103x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $648

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16