| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150626 |
| Uptime | 4 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 22 '22 at 00:02 |
| Run Duration | 271 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 38% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.9%
Good
|
56% 89.8 Pts
|
34% 267 Pts
|
20% 331 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Device(4D50 4449) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
147%
Outstanding
|
174% 203 fps
|
129% 161 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 295 359 369 386 389 MB/s
|
84.5%
Excellent
|
91% 403 MB/s
|
125% 40.2 MB/s
|
44% 102 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$113
534GB free
Firmware: SVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 298 361 370 388 391 MB/s
|
81%
Excellent
|
80% 357 MB/s
|
106% 34.8 MB/s
|
153% 208 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
132GB free
Firmware: MX4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 94 93 96 95 MB/s
|
48.6%
Average
|
53% 72.2 MB/s
|
118% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
37.9%
Below average
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
25% 8.77 GB/s
|
51% 77.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,815 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 865x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 644x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 437x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 186x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 159x |
| RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 118x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $358 |