Samsung 370R4E/370R4V/370R5E/3570RE/370R5V

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Samsung 370R4E/370R4V/370R5E/3570RE/370R5V (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP370R5E-S09RU
Memory	3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '17 at 10:54
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 84.3 2-Core 153 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 206 27% 205 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C706) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2875 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.56% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 4.23 Parallax 2.78 3% 3.65 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.57 4% 4.89 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.56% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD Smartbuy 240GB 1,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1928 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 518 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 748 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1769524 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 36 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850919454 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2697	86.7% Excellent	Read 420 Write 501 Mixed 513 107% 478 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 15.8 83% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 323 DQ Write 354 DQ Mixed 70.6 127% 249 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 M471B5773EB0-CK0 6GB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	45.4% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 14 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 13.6 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 370R4E/370R4V/370R5E/3570RE/370R5V Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 370R4E/370R4V/370R5E/3570RE/370R5V

CPU
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	18x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	12x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	10x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	47x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	4x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	2x

SSD
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	2x
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	2x
SP580 120GBAdataBench 54%, 3,644 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	9x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	6x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 1x4GBAdataBench 30%, 1,080 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16