Lenovo 82JQ

Performance Results

Gaming 129%
Desktop 105%
Workstation 122%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82JQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220616
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '22 at 09:02
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 164
2-Core 327
102% 191 Pts
4-Core 643
8-Core 882
96% 762 Pts
64-Core 1,342
83% 1,342 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 100%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3A4F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 181
Parallax 180
141% 178 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 128
Splatting 122
117% 147 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
842GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 972 1885 2104 2299 2301 1018 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,320
Write 2,234
Mixed 2,153
SusWrite 1,763
477% 2,117 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 73.4
238% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1060
DQ Write 807
DQ Mixed 909
687% 925 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 316%
Great: 410%
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L2 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 3L1QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2172 855 812 811 810 812 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,208
Write 2332
Mixed 1774
SusWrite 1,045
413% 1,840 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 69.6
231% 79.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,115
DQ Write 882
DQ Mixed 966
732% 988 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 268%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD832A.C16FN 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 35.6
111% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 45.9
SC Mixed 33.2
103% 36 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82JQ Builds (Compare 3,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

System: Lenovo 82JQ

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback