Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics41.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '17 at 19:10
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5930K-$250
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
1-Core 128
2-Core 255
90% 192 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 859
87% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,028
69% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$540
Asus(1043 8593) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.0
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (143 fps cap detected)
41.8% Average
Lighting 144
Reflection 143
Parallax 143
38% 143 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 143
Splatting 143
42% 143 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 114%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata SU800 960GB
559GB free
Firmware: X41200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.7% Excellent
Read 494
Write 218
Mixed 273
72% 328 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 22.5
120% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 37.1
92% 196 MB/s
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$350
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,506
Write 1,276
Mixed 1,328
305% 1,370 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 62
248% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 565
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 223
236% 395 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 235%
Great: 283%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 142
Write 114
Mixed 108
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.61
4K Mixed 0.2
110% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2200 MHz clocked @ 2333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 48.3
MC Write 48.5
MC Mixed 46.1
136% 47.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 25.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 124%
Great: 123%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 3,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $948
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $224
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback