Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '22 at 12:24
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 87.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 771
73% 606 Pts
64-Core 1,010
62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 76.6
61% 75.6 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 68.6
57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 885 675 673 660 650 618 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 2,009
Write 1,774
Mixed 1,331
SusWrite 693
324% 1,452 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 63.7
195% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 645
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 628
451% 582 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 209%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
167GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 464 463 479 478 435 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 460
Mixed 389
SusWrite 461
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 50
168% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
7GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 114 114 113 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 122
Write 118
Mixed 70
SusWrite 112
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 69%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 53.4
Write 34.7
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 42.1
53% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
89% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.4% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 22.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $719
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback