Asus A88X-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A88X-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory16.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 07:07
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Memory 47.1
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 84.8
35% 58.1 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 117
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 12.5
6% 8.7 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 6.9
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3K87RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 125 95 92 84 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.9% Below average
Read 268
Write 199
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 119
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 14.2
46% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 57.9
47% 70.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 88%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
0GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 252
Write 222
Mixed 226
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 19
65% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 35.4
DQ Mixed 44.4
48% 84.9 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
24GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 100 98 102 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 101
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 102
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
284GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 128 127 126 131 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 92.3
Write 90.9
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 128
67% 92 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
65% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 106%
Seagate Backup+ Desktop 4TB
940GB free
Firmware: 1404
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 117 112 114 121 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 87.7
Write 109
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 118
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.5
182% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
603GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 21 22 26 20 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 75.1
Write 24.1
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 23
25% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 CMY16GX3M2A2400C11 TIMETEC-UD3-1600 TIMETEC-UD3-1600 32GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.7% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.37 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88X-PLUS Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88X-PLUS - $114

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $286
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback