Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 22:09
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 225
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 688
67% 552 Pts
64-Core 856
53% 856 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 54.1
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 47.2
44% 52.2 fps
MRender 40.5
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 44.5
37% 44.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S211028a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 411 401 428 441 425 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 DDR4 3000 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 33.1
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 29.7
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback