Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Memory 13.4 1-Core 38.2 2-Core 75.9 22% 42.5 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 111 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 96 6% 96 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 0.7 1% 1.2 fps	MRender 0.4 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 0.2 1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS240GMTS420S 240GB 851 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: U1013A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 182 181 182 193 180 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.7% Below average	Read 210 Write 191 Mixed 192 SusWrite 182 44% 194 MB/s	4K Read 11.7 4K Write 36.4 4K Mixed 7.8 47% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 31.3 49% 93.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 7.5 23% 8.17 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.2 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 374 11% 374 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	26x
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	10x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	35x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	20x
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16