Asus PRIME Z270-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-P  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 23:27
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 85.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 258
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 681
69% 559 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.4% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 74.2
Parallax 67.9
57% 70.6 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 67.1
56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7528
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.58% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 8.4
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 11.4
8% 9.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.58%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 411 417 438 437 443 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 452
Mixed 435
SusWrite 427
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 48.2
159% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 289
238% 339 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 112%
Great: 125%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
139GB free
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 35 28 26 21 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 368
Write 95.8
Mixed 127
SusWrite 36.6
34% 157 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 23.3
103% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 84.3
DQ Mixed 42.2
78% 164 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 85%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
787GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 71 72 71 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 114
Write 96.3
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 71.9
109% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 64%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1TB
597GB free, PID 0b1a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 57 54 63 61 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 76.2
Write 65.1
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 56.4
71% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$118
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2187 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-P Builds (Compare 6,371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-P - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $665
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback