Asus SABERTOOTH P67

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH P67 (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '17 at 22:44
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Memory 96.4 1-Core 119 2-Core 234 86% 150 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 588 62% 495 Pts	64-Core 594 37% 594 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 170 Reflection 212 Parallax 192 138% 191 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 186 Splatting 128 121% 149 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160 11,787 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 107GB free Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 6212087 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 51007031643145 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 483 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 206 (B1) Unknown 0 0 9 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 26 37 38657130522 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 6212087 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 6212087 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 6212087 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 25007 (EA) Unknown 0 0 17091 (F1) Unknown 0 0 17091 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23822	59.4% Above average	Read 498 Write 125 Mixed 178 58% 267 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 14.1 85% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 38.6 61% 118 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 81%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3483 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 27 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 61 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 25 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4681772051	65.4% Good	Read 283 Write 190 Mixed 230 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 35.6 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 34.6 123% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 83.9 DQ Mixed 51.9 52% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 124%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 92GB free Firmware: M0C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3460 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 26 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 9 (AE) Unknown 100 100 22 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 72 61 167504904220 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 4 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 4364462857 (F7) Unknown 100 100 136483481 (F8) Unknown 100 100 78120850 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1949 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	51.6% Above average	Read 308 Write 160 Mixed 185 48% 218 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 21.2 83% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 70.4 DQ Mixed 44.3 46% 77.5 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 99%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 137 137 34386674092 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 159 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3483 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 26 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 241 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 241 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 150325231645 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	107% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 180 Mixed 79.6 111% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.12 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.21 108% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 231GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 173 2291 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 144 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3479 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 26 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 4 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2858 (C2) HDA temperature 115 107 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71% Very good	Read 121 Write 127 Mixed 63.7 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.18 4K Write 2.57 4K Mixed 0.34 135% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 109%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 79GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 163 160 4833 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4973 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 12 12 64691 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1174 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 540 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4967 (C2) HDA temperature 118 103 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	44% Average	Read 79.5 Write 73.3 Mixed 29.1 44% 60.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.49 127% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 2x8GB 7,008 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	59.4% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 18.4 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 18.7 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 52.6 76% 52.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH P67 Builds (Compare 1,262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH P67

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	577x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	232x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	129x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	105x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	101x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	43x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	41x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	39x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	60x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	45x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $599

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16