Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 19:48
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 53.9
2-Core 111
53% 83 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 299
30% 241 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
PwrHis(1787 200F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.7% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 55.5
34% 48.1 fps
MRender 45.2
Gravity 43
Splatting 32.7
32% 40.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 114 127 107 128 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 165
Write 178
Mixed 208
SusWrite 115
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 22.7
75% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 67.4
DQ Mixed 33.9
30% 42.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 85%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$60
351GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 118 127 108 128 98 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 352
Write 321
Mixed 285
SusWrite 116
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 29.5
94% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 38.3
DQ Write 72.8
DQ Mixed 47.4
38% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
780GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 113 115 115 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 101
Write 100
Mixed 57
SusWrite 114
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.5% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 7.6
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback