Asus SABERTOOTH X99

Performance Results


Gaming 113% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X99 (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '17 at 23:39
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Memory 93.7 1-Core 117 2-Core 243 85% 151 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 772 77% 625 Pts	64-Core 952 59% 952 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6288) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2515 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Lighting 166 Reflection 165 Parallax 152 136% 161 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 153 Splatting 119 106% 131 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 84GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1283 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 623 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 80 51 20 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 43 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4894138878	99.5% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 415 Mixed 422 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 97.8 4K Mixed 28.2 158% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 47.3 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 27.8 62% 119 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 131%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 31GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3969910 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 129261335742584 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1151 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 281 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 18 43 21477654546 (C2) HDA temperature 18 43 21477654546 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3969910 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3969910 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3969910 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1025 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1181 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1181 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2157 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2359321	62.9% Good	Read 514 Write 112 Mixed 138 55% 255 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 12.3 114% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 27.9 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 12.4 28% 53.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2680 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1425 (B1) Unknown 97 97 56 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 48 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 157 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21789975947	95.2% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 416 Mixed 419 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 45 4K Write 98.6 4K Mixed 27.5 156% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 47.1 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 27 35% 60 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 740GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 72 65 20853706 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 117 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 60 60 1248390 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 238 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 117 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 62 387186711 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 117 (C2) HDA temperature 23 7 30064771095 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 4 1 20853706 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 59665685676269 (F1) Unknown 100 253 986585143 (F2) Unknown 100 253 550885745	92.7% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 149 Mixed 150 119% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.22 91% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 113%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 187GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 20 (03) Spinup time 111 100 7408 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5488 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15536 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5455 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 683 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 152 152 144545 (C2) HDA temperature 123 94 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.6% Above average	Read 94.5 Write 88.7 Mixed 76.2 65% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.24 81% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 57%
Samsung HD160JJ/P 160GB-$40 2,028 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 133GB free Firmware: ZM100-34 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5632 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14819 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8744 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7667 (BE) vendor-specific 175 73 21 (C2) HDA temperature 175 73 21 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 10600 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	32.9% Below average	Read 55.9 Write 58.5 Mixed 51.6 42% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.45 98% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB 1,010 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 42 MC Write 43.2 MC Mixed 37.7 117% 41 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 21.3 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 60.5 66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X99 Builds (Compare 955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X99

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	353x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	157x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	127x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	107x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	39x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	33x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	30x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 120%, 113 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $622

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16