ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	ECT
Motherboard	MSI Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170627
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '22 at 13:54
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 123 2-Core 244 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 384 50% 377 Pts	64-Core 411 26% 411 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.1 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 65.4 160% 65.4 fps
Poor: 46% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56 10,555 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFZ10.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 51 55 65 5.9 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 303 Write 250 Mixed 291 SusWrite 48.9 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 28.2 108% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 54.3 DQ Mixed 3.6 50% 126 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 89%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 69GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 273 276 274 275 249 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 395 Write 384 Mixed 341 SusWrite 284 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 68.3 4K Mixed 40.8 139% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 227 205% 311 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 118%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$107 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 268GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 397 275 81 81 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 401 Write 380 Mixed 347 SusWrite 219 76% 337 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 75.9 4K Mixed 41.5 139% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 352 265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 128%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 253GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 29 26 30 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 11.2 Write 21.1 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 26.2 14% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 15% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD2 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD2 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 16GB 131 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 27.6 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 24.7 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback