Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Memory 77.9 1-Core 66.9 2-Core 141 57% 95.2 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 325 32% 262 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 847A) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.04 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24% Poor	Lighting 27.2 Reflection 29 Parallax 35.6 22% 30.6 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 36.1 Splatting 29.2 28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 382 Write 379 Mixed 338 82% 366 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 45.5 4K Mixed 26.2 91% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 329 248% 332 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 422GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 412 438 445 436 414 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 404 Write 396 Mixed 319 SusWrite 405 86% 381 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 59.3 4K Mixed 28.3 108% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 275 224% 318 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 21GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 179 181 177 175 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 154 Mixed 74 SusWrite 175 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 109%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB 837 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 18GB free, PID 6362 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 15.5 Write 11.8 Mixed 9.3 15% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 2 140% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT2K102464BD160B 2x8GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 7.3 25% 8.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 6.9 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 84.6 47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	41x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	35x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	78x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	36x
AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S 2x8GBUnknownBench 56%, 671 samples	36x

Value: 90% - Outstanding

Total price: $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16