Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '22 at 07:08
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T-$254 4,420 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 44.2 2-Core 88.1 44% 68.3 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 195 23% 179 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.04 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Lighting 22.6 Reflection 34.6 Parallax 31.2 18% 29.5 fps	MRender 31.7 Gravity 30.4 Splatting 24.8 23% 29 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 222 Write 220 Mixed 227 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 30.7 105% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 33.4 DQ Write 89.6 DQ Mixed 41.9 38% 55 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 150 Write 145 Mixed 106 99% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB 16,094 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 515GB free Firmware: SC11 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 95.3 Write 104 Mixed 52 62% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 100%
Kingston Reader MicSD/M2 32GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 22GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 15.8 Write 2.7 Mixed 7.5 9% 8.67 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.1 49% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	30% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 12.3 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 8 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 95.6 42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-890FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890FXA-UD5

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	42x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	15x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	13x
HD 6950AMD $290Bench 19%, 24,657 samples	6x
R9 390AMD $325Bench 50%, 82,117 samples	4x

SSD
GP-GSTFS31120GN 120GBGigabyteBench 68%, 187 samples	10x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	10x
MX100 128GBCrucial $74Bench 76%, 9,892 samples	3x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	25x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	16x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $480

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16