Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X515JP
Memory	21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '22 at 17:20
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 73 1-Core 122 2-Core 208 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 460 53% 413 Pts	64-Core 461 29% 461 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1F0F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	9.67% Terrible	Lighting 15 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 16 12% 16.1 fps	MRender 17 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.7 5% 6.57 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.67% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB 12,615 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.19.B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1158 1207 1227 1223 1228 478 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	246% Outstanding	Read 1,869 Write 1,279 Mixed 1,239 SusWrite 1,087 306% 1,369 MB/s	4K Read 58.4 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 66.5 264% 98.5 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 759 DQ Mixed 82.2 198% 400 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 246% Great: 240%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 803GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 121 121 116 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	75% Very good	Read 139 Write 136 Mixed 56.4 SusWrite 121 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 0.6 245% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 859B CB16GS2666.C8ET 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 3200, 2667 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	65.4% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 19.7 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 17.9 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 94.6 42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JP_X515JP

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	86x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	81x
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	4x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	60x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	59x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples	52x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	36x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	31x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	14x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBMicronBench 71%, 1,143 samples	33x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	25x
M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,191 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16