Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory15.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 04:30
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 68
1-Core 166
2-Core 317
96% 183 Pts
4-Core 555
8-Core 924
90% 739 Pts
64-Core 1,344
83% 1,344 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 112%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3290 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.8% Above average
Lighting 76.5
Reflection 80.3
Parallax 76.2
62% 77.7 fps
MRender 69.4
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 60.7
55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 62%
Nvidia RTX 3060-$274
EVGA(3842 3656) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2287 MHz, MLim: 4225 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.6% Very good
Lighting 97.6
Reflection 87.6
Parallax 90.4
80% 91.9 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 76.7
Splatting 63.6
65% 82.2 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 512GB 512GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08435
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 322 330 321 325 330 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 264
Write 242
Mixed 245
SusWrite 322
61% 268 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 23.8
94% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 173
130% 174 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 100%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
197GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1313 1290 1275 1293 1294 1180 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 1,848
Write 1,287
Mixed 1346
SusWrite 1,274
322% 1,439 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 69.7
220% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,314
DQ Write 1,007
DQ Mixed 1,143
860% 1,155 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 272%
Great: 435%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 347 330 336 344 341 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 347
Write 311
Mixed 296
SusWrite 338
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 28.8
89% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 134
115% 170 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 171 174 171 176 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 151
Mixed 72
SusWrite 173
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 Silicon-Power Silicon-Power 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58% Above average
MC Read 24
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 23.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 19.6
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 58%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback