User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago.

System	ECT
Motherboard	MSI Z270 SLI PLUS (MS-7A59)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170627
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '22 at 10:56
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	47%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 419 54% 409 Pts	64-Core 434 27% 434 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 2120 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.1 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 65.9 161% 65.9 fps
Poor: 46% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56 10,555 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFZ10.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 94 94 94 93 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 471 Write 389 Mixed 358 SusWrite 130 75% 337 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 69.4 4K Mixed 32.7 129% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 319 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 205 186% 281 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 89%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 69GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 278 275 277 277 227 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 454 Mixed 417 SusWrite 278 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 76 4K Mixed 46.2 155% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 369 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 223 204% 312 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 118%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$114 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 264GB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 451 288 82 82 83 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 459 Mixed 424 SusWrite 235 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 80.4 4K Mixed 47.3 156% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 358 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 128%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 263GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 58 58 59 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 98.5 Write 103 Mixed 69.8 SusWrite 58.9 61% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD2 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD2 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 16GB 131 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.4% Very good	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 26.3 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 29.7 SC Mixed 23.5 66% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16