Asus H110M-CS

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 16 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-CS (all builds)
Memory	0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190703
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '22 at 10:52
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	BGD-User
Background CPU	61%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100T-$108 6,076 User benchmarks, average bench 58% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 158 61% 105 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 233 29% 221 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	2.83% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 5.6 4% 4.4 fps	MRender 0.1 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.1 0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.83% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teutons Platinum SSD 128GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1125A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 101 89 50 31 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 403 Write 316 Mixed 357 SusWrite 73.4 64% 287 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 12.7 79% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 67.9 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 27.4 60% 116 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 465GB free Firmware: CC6B SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 94 101 102 100 101 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 100 Write 99.5 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 99.7 66% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 70%
ST925031 5AS 250GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 94GB free, PID 0c15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 38 38 36 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 23.5 Write 35.6 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 35.7 41% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 1x4GB 2,041 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 9.4 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.9 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	245x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	145x
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples	90x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	127x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	116x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	106x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	39x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	33x

RAM
1x4GBAdataBench 31%, 5,816 samples	34x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16