Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141202
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '22 at 10:49
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	38%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4330 Quad-Core 881 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 56 2-Core 71.4 46% 67.9 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 162 18% 145 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCA) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42% Average	Lighting 54.3 Reflection 77.9 Parallax 48.4 44% 60.2 fps	MRender 42.7 Gravity 49.8 Splatting 45.2 38% 45.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Eaget SSD 120GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.3S SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 164 95 53 59 57 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.3% Below average	Read 207 Write 181 Mixed 158 SusWrite 77.8 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 39.6 4K Mixed 8.6 61% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.4 DQ Write 56.8 DQ Mixed 10.6 16% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 69%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 76GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 90 87 93 93 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 60.4 Write 61.2 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 91.2 49% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 10.9 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	508x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	325x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	185x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	127x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	90x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	85x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	56x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	355x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	346x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	309x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16