Lenovo 82RG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82RG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 09:28
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Memory 5.08
1-Core 27.6
2-Core 59.4
15% 30.7 Pts
4-Core 93.9
8-Core 162
16% 128 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 99%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL2 512GB
325GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL1QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1131 838 843 844 741 772 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 739
Write 691
Mixed 649
SusWrite 861
166% 735 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 30.2
72% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 223
170% 231 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 116%
Great: 428%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 19.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 452
9% 452 ns
Poor: 95%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 64 0" 1280 720
Typical 82RG Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

System: Lenovo 82RG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $445Crucial MX500 250GB $32
Intel Core i7-12700K $326Nvidia RTX 3070 $530Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3050 $270Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback