Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161116
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 09:07
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$150
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 157
53% 117 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 258
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 52% Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 6.1
4% 5 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 7.1
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 6%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 309
Write 278
Mixed 106
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 18.8
64% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 99.6
89% 137 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDR1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 5
17% 5.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 3.1
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 573
7% 573 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 6 60 17" 1280 720 DEL4058 DELL P170S
Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $316
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $425Crucial MX500 250GB $32
Intel Core i7-12700K $326Nvidia RTX 3070 $529Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3050 $270Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $77G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback