| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 70.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190514 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 25 '22 at 06:01 |
| Run Duration | 119 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 32% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
82.6%
Excellent
|
81% 145 Pts
|
68% 534 Pts
|
33% 533 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
Asus(1043 877E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
70.3%
Very good
|
72% 84.1 fps
|
68% 85.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NFS011SA324-6007000 240GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0212B0
|
72% 326 MB/s
|
82% 19.8 MB/s
| ||
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
110GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 104 103 103 103 MB/s
|
76.6%
Very good
|
94% 128 MB/s
|
212% 1.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
63.4%
Good
|
66% 23 GB/s
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
51% 78.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,791 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,296x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,134x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 135x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 563x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 308x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 266x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $285 |