Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime14.3 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 03:23
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 97%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$229
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 195
63% 115 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 531
58% 458 Pts
64-Core 613
38% 613 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$450
Gigabyte(1458 4076) ≥ 4GB; RTX 3060 TI Eagle 8G
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Lighting 201
Reflection 182
Parallax 175
163% 186 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 141
Splatting 121
120% 151 fps
Poor: 120%
This bench: 143%
Great: 140%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 852 418 541 536 496 527 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,077
Write 1,126
Mixed 983
SusWrite 562
211% 937 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 48.2
167% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,071
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 1,000
747% 995 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 173%
Great: 228%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
832GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 419 434 460 458 451 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 398
Mixed 382
SusWrite 432
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 35.8
129% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 352
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
860GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 420 434 461 459 452 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 405
Write 352
Mixed 412
SusWrite 433
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 39.2
132% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 350
265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 133%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$77
63GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,439
Write 1,333
Mixed 995
279% 1,256 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 61.8
206% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 632
DQ Write 854
DQ Mixed 258
330% 582 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 255%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.9% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.4
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 53 60 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3205 M32QC
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 5,181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $187

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,244
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3070 $530Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i7-12700K $322Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $170Nvidia RTX 3050 $295Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $53SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback