| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1495 |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111110 |
| Uptime | 11.3 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 19 '22 at 00:57 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 48% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.4%
Good
|
66% 111 Pts
|
34% 253 Pts
|
17% 272 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1495) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
0.64%
Terrible
|
0% 0.97 fps
|
1% 1.27 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 32 8 8 9.7 25 MB/s
|
22.2%
Poor
|
34% 45.9 MB/s
|
106% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.6%
Average
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
34% 12 GB/s
|
54% 73.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,259 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 1,668x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 553x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 545x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,776x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 275x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 238x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |