Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	91.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago, 20 months ago, 18 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '22 at 11:08
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 73.6 1-Core 108 2-Core 214 73% 132 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 740 71% 584 Pts	64-Core 1,069 66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.2% Outstanding	Lighting 113 Reflection 129 Parallax 116 92% 119 fps	MRender 93.1 Gravity 121 Splatting 112 90% 109 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 147GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 181 183 206 201 177 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 429 Mixed 264 SusWrite 192 77% 347 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 77.5 4K Mixed 44.1 149% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 278 225% 319 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 882GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 115 113 106 111 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	52% Above average	Read 70 Write 80.8 Mixed 64.3 SusWrite 110 60% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.5 194% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 90%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 138 139 139 138 137 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 139 Write 134 Mixed 66 SusWrite 138 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 74 73 73 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 144 Write 134 Mixed 73.8 SusWrite 72.7 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 96%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 130 129 129 130 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 116 Write 124 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 128 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 145 144 144 145 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 150 Write 138 Mixed 78.7 SusWrite 144 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 84%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 103 100 100 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 100 Write 51 Mixed 54.3 SusWrite 100 56% 76.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 58%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 8TB 473 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 857GB free, PID 0a10 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 178 174 173 173 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 207 Write 178 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 173 198% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.CAGPK.4020B 2x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	84.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 28.1 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 23.5 70% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 93.2 43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)