User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X79
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 04:58
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 604
63% 504 Pts
64-Core 759
47% 759 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$447
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.10.3
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.5% Excellent
Lighting 86.3
Reflection 132
Parallax 173
70% 130 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 88.5
Splatting 154
118% 144 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 91%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 115 110 113 117 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 151
Write 134
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 115
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/ KHX1600C10D3/ 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 20.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.4
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback