Asus P8H61-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '22 at 15:12
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 160
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 323
41% 312 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Gigabyte(1458 404E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 204
Parallax 185
178% 203 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 147
Splatting 135
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 149%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 215 222 241 243 243 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65% Good
Read 231
Write 220
Mixed 195
SusWrite 223
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 31.4
107% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 171
136% 189 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 65%
Great: 128%
Kingdian S400 120GB
24GB free
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 45 46 47 40 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.7% Below average
Read 226
Write 214
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 61.9
31% 138 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 19.6
68% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 33.3
DQ Mixed 35.6
39% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 97%
Lexar 1TB SSD 1TB
817GB free
Firmware: V0624D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 218 226 244 246 244 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 334
Write 227
Mixed 261
SusWrite 227
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 23.9
100% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 274
216% 304 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 483%
Toshiba MK1652GSX 160GB-$30
149GB free
Firmware: LV011C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 61 61 61 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 55.4
Write 57.1
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 59.8
39% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 34%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
130GB free
Firmware: GH2OA420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 125
Write 112
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 75.4
62% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 9905403-579.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX Builds (Compare 1,408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback