Medion MD35147

Performance Results

Gaming 105%
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemMedion MD35147  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B460H6-EM
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '22 at 00:14
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 83.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 242
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 685
69% 559 Pts
64-Core 940
58% 940 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 470.05
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 170
Parallax 161
146% 170 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 139
Splatting 117
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-512G-PHISON-SSD-B27 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 444 440 464 464 462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 301
Write 424
Mixed 364
SusWrite 450
87% 385 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 33.4
128% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 195
168% 244 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 18.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD35147 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 61%
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 55%

System: Medion MD35147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $290
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback