Gigabyte GA-Z490M GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z490M GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200325
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 16:34
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-10700K-$270
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 148
2-Core 288
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 1,020
96% 799 Pts
64-Core 1,528
94% 1,528 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 522.30
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.7% Very good
Lighting 91.8
Reflection 89.3
Parallax 82.5
75% 87.9 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 70.7
68% 85.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 76%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$45
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1476 950 170 162 168 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,377
Write 1,929
Mixed 1,503
SusWrite 513
300% 1,330 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 60.2
198% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 914
DQ Write 673
DQ Mixed 783
588% 790 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 183%
Great: 304%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$114
186GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 932 430 430 431 431 434 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,384
Write 1,644
Mixed 1,227
SusWrite 515
268% 1,192 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 57.6
194% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 997
DQ Write 669
DQ Mixed 823
616% 829 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 184%
Great: 237%
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
453GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 156 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 144
Write 135
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 156
30% 131 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 1.2
23% 7.87 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 2.2
3% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 46%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
376GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 108 111 110 110 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 64.2
Write 105
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 109
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
163GB free
Firmware: 0604
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 99 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 123
Write 95.2
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 99.9
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 30.3
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 31.1
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 53
75% 53 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ8024 BenQ LCD
Typical GA-Z490M GAMING X Builds (Compare 841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 141%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490M GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,028
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $410Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3070 $568Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $164Nvidia RTX 3050 $298Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback