ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 810-219nb

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP 810-219nb (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140912
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '17 at 17:42
Run Duration	95 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 79.1 1-Core 101 2-Core 178 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 487 50% 402 Pts	64-Core 539 33% 539 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% HP(103C 6516) ≥ 4GB CLim: 841 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.10.3 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.2% Below average	Lighting 37.8 Reflection 49.2 Parallax 54.3 31% 47.1 fps	MRender 48.9 Gravity 39.5 Splatting 58.2 41% 48.9 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 50%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100 4,989 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231706 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 6959 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1120 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 95 95 657147297793 (AE) Unknown 100 100 96 (B7) Unknown 253 253 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 44 (BE) vendor-specific 58 51 42 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	63.3% Good	Read 406 Write 240 Mixed 291 69% 312 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 14.9 94% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 33.1 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 13.3 40% 80.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 4x8GB 1,248 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 16.3 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 19.7 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback