Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '17 at 13:22
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 96.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 262
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 858
83% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25
38GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 119
Write 12.7
Mixed 50.7
60% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.09
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 1.26
73% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 33
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 22.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 101%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $623
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback