Fujitsu CELSIUS M470

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M470 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D2778-B1
Memory	14.7 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20091104
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '22 at 18:11
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3520-$400 6,508 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 70.2 2-Core 86.9 56% 82.3 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 301 33% 263 Pts	64-Core 315 20% 315 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 1081) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	6.64% Terrible	Lighting 8.2 Reflection 8.7 Parallax 9.3 7% 8.73 fps	MRender 10.3 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7 7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.64% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Dell Virtual Disk 479GB 383GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1028 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 61 64 63 64 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 288GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 112 113 112 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 105 Write 122 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 111 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 88%
WD WD22PURZ-85B4ZY0 2TB 531 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 87GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 89 85 86 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 45.3 Write 79.9 Mixed 44.6 SusWrite 86.5 47% 64.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.5 176% 2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 95%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 34GB free Firmware: PB4OC60F SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 45 44 45 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 43.2 Write 54.1 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 44.2 32% 43 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 45%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.2 4 4 4.4 4.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 253 Write 5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.3 48% 67 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Mixed 0 191% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 18GB 8,131 User benchmarks, average bench 42% null MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	43.6% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 16.4 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 12.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M470 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M470

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $400Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	16x
Xeon E5520IntelBench 59%, 1,397 samples	4x
Xeon E5540IntelBench 63%, 486 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	7x
Quadro FX 3800NvidiaBench 6%, 3,739 samples	3x
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples	3x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $40Bench 104%, 39,067 samples	4x
120GB 120GBPolionBench 69%, 12 samples	3x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	2x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	12x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	6x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $316	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $215	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $396	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $260	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $54	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16