Performance Results

Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop 61%
Workstation 46%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics83.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 10UE
MotherboardMSI MS-16W2  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '22 at 14:12
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 15.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
61% 128 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 644
70% 555 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 51%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12F2) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver.
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.9% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 102
Parallax 103
90% 105 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 89
Splatting 73.1
73% 91.8 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 564 789 863 1097 1096 1096 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 914
Write 822
Mixed 736
SusWrite 917
191% 847 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 50.9
171% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 550
DQ Write 418
DQ Mixed 263
257% 410 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 167%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 5
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 357
11% 357 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16W2 Builds (Compare 4,861 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 77%
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W2

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback