Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 18 '22 at 15:46
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$193
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 165
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 508
49% 403 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.14029.5006
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.3% Average
Lighting 52.3
Reflection 55
Parallax 81.8
43% 63 fps
MRender 56.7
Gravity 57.9
Splatting 41.9
42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 49%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Ssdpr-s4 00U-240-80 240GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 31 106 9.5 20 61 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
Read 144
Write 91
Mixed 114
SusWrite 41.7
22% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 8.6
50% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 29.5
50% 102 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$48
173GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 76 88 93 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 132
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 83
64% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Transcend JM3200HLG-8G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 20.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 17
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 167 10 60 28.9" 1360 768 PHLD070 PHI19PFL3405H
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 4,480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $391
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $302Nvidia RTX 3060 $360Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback