Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	75.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8574
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220719
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '22 at 21:58
Run Duration	61 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Memory 91.6 1-Core 122 2-Core 240 86% 151 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 710 71% 578 Pts	64-Core 933 58% 933 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% HP(103C 8574) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 522.25 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	75.1% Very good	Lighting 89.8 Reflection 96.8 Parallax 91.5 73% 92.7 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 81.5 Splatting 83.1 79% 98.7 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 83%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA266.C8FE 2x16GB 1,235 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	81.7% Excellent	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 23.2 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 24.9 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 50%

Yacht

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	1,163x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	927x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	454x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	336x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	271x
TOSHIBA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 173%, 3,049 samples	191x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	670x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	224x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 8,097 samples	172x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16