Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual T2390 1,249 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Memory 40.3 1-Core 8.7 2-Core 16.9 17% 22 Pts	4-Core 14.8 8-Core 16.2 2% 15.5 Pts	64-Core 14 1% 14 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 36%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB-$298 2,804 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBCOC31P Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 250 250 55834574849 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 8212 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 18750 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 8163 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 327 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 45 45 555489 (C2) HDA temperature 125 125 257698693164 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 10 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	28.7% Poor	Read 52.2 Write 47.5 Mixed 8.52 26% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.34 73% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	6.66% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 1.4 MC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.83 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 2.1 6% 2.17 GB/s	Latency 201 20% 201 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.66% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16