| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M LE (all builds) |
| Memory | 1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110303 |
| Uptime | 4.5 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 29 '17 at 23:25 |
| Run Duration | 394 Seconds |
| Run User | HKG-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.3%
Good
|
68% 112 Pts
|
29% 214 Pts
|
13% 208 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2266
|
1.33%
Terrible
|
1% 1.58 fps
|
2% 1.92 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
45.4%
Average
|
46% 62.4 MB/s
|
81% 0.68 MB/s
| |
|
General USB Flash Disk 4GB
2GB free, PID 800b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
3.83%
Terrible
|
9% 8.4 MB/s
|
13% 1.16 MB/s
| |
|
|
7.71%
Terrible
|
17% 14.5 MB/s
|
46% 1.68 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5458-005.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
28.3%
Poor
|
25% 8.83 GB/s
|
22% 7.7 GB/s
|
62% 64 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,010 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 163x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 109x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 83x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 158x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 79x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 35x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $211 |