Asus Z170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '17 at 13:19
Run Duration571 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 60%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 84.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 453
62% 462 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 83%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Lighting 68.4
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 58.8
56% 65.2 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 68.2
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 397
Mixed 406
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 43.4
164% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 113
133% 231 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
96GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 94.8
Mixed 98.9
74% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.22
84% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
74GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 63.8
Write 65.9
Mixed 88.9
56% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.33
77% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
41GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 61.6
Write 85.8
Mixed 78
57% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.13
64% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
8GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 90.7
Mixed 92.6
69% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.18
78% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 113%
Apple iPod 1GB
0GB free, PID 1300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Read 3.67
Write 2.41
Mixed 2.91
4% 3 MB/s
4K Read 2.98
4K Write 0.12
4K Mixed 0.12
19% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.6
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS - $87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $536
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback