Monster TULPAR T7 V20.2

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 13 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V20.2 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.2
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210225
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '22 at 02:33
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	10%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 90 1-Core 127 2-Core 240 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 446 8-Core 659 69% 552 Pts	64-Core 769 48% 769 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Device(1D05 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Lighting 96.8 Reflection 103 Parallax 105 79% 102 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 87.3 Splatting 86.8 75% 93.2 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80 85,928 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 566GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1074 647 925 896 895 887 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	216% Outstanding	Read 1,861 Write 1,421 Mixed 181 SusWrite 888 241% 1,088 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 52.4 185% 65.7 MB/s	DQ Read 844 DQ Write 530 DQ Mixed 510 428% 628 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 372%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB 7,927 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 1TB free Firmware: 411040RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 447 445 466 467 468 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 368 Mixed 302 SusWrite 455 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 64.4 4K Mixed 35.9 114% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 227 197% 292 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GB 2,090 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.5% Very good	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 20.2 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 34.6 SC Mixed 23.7 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.2 Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.2

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	532x

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	319x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	213x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 7,447 samples	109x
MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 199%, 3,806 samples	70x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00000 1TBSamsungBench 275%, 9,396 samples	45x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	192x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	63x
CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 70%, 2,090 samples	62x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16