Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 455-$90 3,733 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Memory 45.9 1-Core 37.8 2-Core 91.2 34% 58.3 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 137 17% 132 Pts	64-Core 113 7% 113 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26% Poor	Lighting 33 Reflection 33.6 Parallax 31.9 27% 32.8 fps	MRender 36 Gravity 33 Splatting 22.9 24% 30.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$54 6,728 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC4B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 62.7 Write 82.3 Mixed 45.8 47% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.3 76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 59%
Seagate ST3120811AS 120GB-$179 472 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 32GB free Firmware: 3.AAE SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 41 40 42 43 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	42% Average	Read 107 Write 13.7 Mixed 25.6 SusWrite 39.9 34% 46.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 10.1 26% 9.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 177 23% 177 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	72x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	42x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	39x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $193

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16