Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA506IC
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211215
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 05 '22 at 00:42
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 269
83% 157 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 806
79% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,031
64% 1,031 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 400 371 391 405 406 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 1,253
Write 376
Mixed 560
SusWrite 390
142% 645 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 11.5
77% 19 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 229%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.6% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC Builds (Compare 785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IC_FA506IC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback