Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 03 '22 at 06:07
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 580
68% 525 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499
Asus(1043 880E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 201
Parallax 211
133% 192 fps
MRender 203
Gravity 152
Splatting 125
127% 160 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 125%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S190802a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.1
Write 299
Mixed 70
31% 134 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 17.6
70% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 87
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 54.2
82% 147 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
40GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 441
Write 434
Mixed 361
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 39.4
136% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
25GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,934
Write 1,873
Mixed 1,548
398% 1,785 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 56.9
184% 61.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 711
DQ Mixed 889
658% 876 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
340GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 445
Write 399
Mixed 387
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 39.8
135% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
113GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 132
Write 130
Mixed 75.1
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Seagate Portable 4TB
172GB free
Firmware: 9300
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.4
Write 95.7
Mixed 70.2
64% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.7
192% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23.4
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 21.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $438
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback