| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU D3161-A1 |
| Memory | 9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141201 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 03 '22 at 05:56 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.8%
Good
|
68% 115 Pts
|
44% 345 Pts
|
26% 412 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.8%
Poor
|
28% 36.6 fps
|
26% 33.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 203 198 204 141 144 MB/s
|
57.5%
Above average
|
47% 208 MB/s
|
93% 32.7 MB/s
|
126% 178 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB
48GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 50 51 64 64 63 MB/s
|
32.9%
Below average
|
40% 54.9 MB/s
|
160% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
47.6%
Average
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
43% 15 GB/s
|
54% 74.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ESPRIMO P710 Builds (Compare 637 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 229x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 97x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 52x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 109x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 85x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 66x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |