Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77 3,540 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 76 1-Core 63 2-Core 107 52% 82.1 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 345 36% 287 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 3625) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Lighting 22.8 Reflection 35.6 Parallax 31.6 19% 30 fps	MRender 33.1 Gravity 29.2 Splatting 25 23% 29.1 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 21%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 120GB-$80 2,275 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.6 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 459 Write 233 Mixed 339 76% 344 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 27.6 100% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 206 164% 232 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$80 42,987 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 152GB free Firmware: 1A11 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 53.5 Write 45.8 Mixed 33.4 33% 44.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- 2x8GB 364 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.7% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8.8 28% 9.83 GB/s	Latency 88.3 45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 68%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	140x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	112x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	90x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	198x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	190x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	82x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16