Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '22 at 21:57
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$57
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 119
55% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 254
30% 230 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
Sapphire(174B E270) 2GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 37.5
Parallax 53
30% 42.6 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 27
25% 31.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 404
Mixed 116
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 31.7
100% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 124
128% 209 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
185GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 166 169 159 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 133
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 159
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40
799GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 29.3
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 29.3
21% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 63%
WD My Passport 082A 2TB
644GB free, PID 082a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 50.9
Write 26.6
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 27.8
40% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
41% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1866C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.2% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 17.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback