Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95 10,699 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 146 60% 100 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 370 38% 310 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xstar 128GB 128GB 342 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2111XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 190 186 187 192 195 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 336 Write 247 Mixed 226 SusWrite 190 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 22.4 78% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 68.3 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 105 97% 142 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 80%
Liteon LCH-256V2S-HP 256GB 1,560 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 108GB free Firmware: 2C02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 194 186 187 192 198 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 427 Write 255 Mixed 249 SusWrite 191 62% 281 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 27 91% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 309 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 195 172% 259 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB 14,844 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	27.8% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 8 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 8.7 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 75.5 53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16