Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820HQ 15,851 User benchmarks, average bench 63% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 48.6 1-Core 44.2 2-Core 110 39% 67.7 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 217 22% 180 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 77%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Visiontek PRO 500GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 436GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 193 189 178 188 194 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.1% Below average	Read 139 Write 139 Mixed 124 SusWrite 188 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 7.1 37% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 67.8 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 29.4 47% 86.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB 27,567 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	39.2% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 13.2 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 10.9 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	626x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	554x
Quadro M2200NvidiaBench 19%, 2,904 samples	488x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	154x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	152x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc401Bench 146%, 10,182 samples	72x

RAM
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 2x16GBUnknownBench 75%, 4,851 samples	235x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 27,567 samples	212x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 4x8GBUnknownBench 76%, 297 samples	94x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16